Foundations for Cooperation in the Prisoners ’ Dilemma
نویسندگان
چکیده
We provide axiomatic foundations for a simple model of play in prisoners’ dilemma games. The model accommodates cooperation and suggests that players behave as if their expectations about their opponents’ behavior vary with their own choice. We refer to this nonstandard updating as magical thinking. The degree to which players exhibit magical thinking may be heterogeneous in the population and is captured by a uniquelyidentified parameter for each player. Further, it is as if all players perceive these parameters to be i.i.d. draws from a common distribution. The model’s identification allows for tractable comparative statics. We investigate how our theory extends to all symmetric 2×2 games.
منابع مشابه
Supplement to Foundations for Cooperation in the Prisoners ’ Dilemma
We establish that in the Prisoners’ Dilemma, the model of Daley and Sadowski (2014) is logically distinct from three models that employ well-known forms of otherregarding preferences: altruism (Ledyard, 1995; Levine, 1998), inequity aversion (Fehr and Schmidt, 1999), and reciprocity (Rabin, 1993). S.
متن کاملRational Cooperation in a Finitely Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma
The Emergence and Evolution of Social Norms: Rational Cooperation in a Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma
متن کاملVoluntary Cooperation Based on Equilibrium Retribution – An Experiment Testing Finite-Horizon Folk Theorems
Unlike previous attempts to implement cooperation in a prisoners’ dilemma game with an infinite horizon in the laboratory, we focus on extended prisoners’ dilemma games in which a second (pure strategy) equilibrium allows for voluntary cooperation in all but the last round. Our four main experimental treatments distinguish long versus short horizon and strict versus non-strict additional equili...
متن کاملCooperation in a Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma with Ostracism
The unique Nash equilibrium of the finitely repeated n-person Prisoners’ Dilemma calls for defection in all rounds. One way to enforce cooperation in groups is ostracism: players who defect are expelled. If the group’s members prefer not to diminish its size, ostracism hurts the legitimate members of the group as well as the outcast. putting the credibility of the threat in doubt. Nonetheless, ...
متن کاملThe Prisoners' Dilemma Revisited
Cooperation has always been recognised as a fundamental ingredient in the creation of societies and the generation of wealth. As a concept, it has been studied for many years. Yet, in practice, its emergence and persistence are less understood. In the following a game theoretic approach to the study of cooperation based on the Prisoners' Dilemma is reviewed. Using a Genetic Algorithm, strategie...
متن کامل